top of page
Writer's pictureAaron Fonseca

Your Nerd Side Review:Intense, But The Idea To Make This One A Musical not so good?!

Updated: Oct 3





The Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga starrer Joker: Folie à Deux has finally been released

The movie marks the sequel to the 2019 film Joker, directed by Todd Phillips. We are done with the first half of the movie, and here’s a quick post-interval review of it.


Joker: Folie à Deux’s plot continues from the events of the 2019 film wherein Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix) is serving a prison sentence for murdering Murray Franklin (Robert De Niro) and four other people. As events lead to his trial, Arthur is labeled as a martyr/celebrity who has just become a victim of his mental illness, while some see him as a downright cold-blooded murderer. Amid this, he meets the deranged Harley Quinn (Lady Gaga), who seems to be bewitched by him, having undergone the same trauma as Arthur, which ultimately lands her in prison. The two start a whirlwind romance in the prison while all eyes are on Arthur’s trial.


the sequel is the complete opposite of the first movie. I left the cinema feeling genuinely confused and let down, wondering how a follow-up to such a phenomenal movie could end up this bad. It felt like a cheap attempt to cash in on the original's success without understanding what made it so great in the first place. The storyline was incredibly weak. Nothing really happens, and the few events that do occur feel disjointed and lack any real impact. At times, I found myself checking the time, hoping for the film to pick up, but it never did. The pacing was slow and aimless, making it a real chore to sit through. One of the most baffling decisions was to introduce a musical element. While it could have been a unique addition, it mostly fell flat. Aside from one or two scenes where it mildly worked, it felt forced and out of place. Instead of enhancing the story, it distracted from the already lacking narrative. It was as if the filmmakers were trying too hard to be artistic, but instead ended up creating something confusing and jarring. Joaquin Phoenix’s performance was, once again, nothing short of amazing. He brought the same intensity and raw emotion that made his portrayal of Arthur Fleck so captivating in the first film.



But the problem was that the story never gave him the chance to fully become his true character. Every time his acting started to get intense and you could feel the build-up of tension, it was broken up by some unnecessary musical element, pulling you out of the moment. It’s almost as if the film actively worked against him, sabotaging his brilliant work with poor choices and disjointed scenes. Ultimately, this movie felt like it was written by several different people with clashing ideas, and then awkwardly stitched together in the hope it would somehow work. Spoiler: it doesn’t. The result is a muddled, uninspired mess that lacks the soul and intensity of its predecessor. If you loved the first Joker, do yourself a favor and pretend this movie doesn’t exist. Let the original stand as a powerful, standalone film that should never have been followed by something so lackluster.

I asked others in the audience and they just didn't like it?!!!

Fonseca




17 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page